Skip to main content

10% Rich Black and the Peppermint Glacier


Black Wolf of the Glacier, my most recent children's book project, is about an almost-black wolf. Colors eyedropped from a photo of Romeo revealed saturation levels ranging from 8 to 42%. While I didn't have an eydropping tool while I was mixing my wash colors, I tried to keep this in mind. On the cover, Romeo will be charcoal colored with 10% saturation.

Of course, part of me thinks: mythology doesn't give a rat's hindquarters about your point samples. An archetype is an archetype; he should have been licorice-flavored, a wolfish essence of a sumi-e ink drawing. 

In the end, though, my reasoning became practical; several of the author's illustration descriptions called for more detail than a silhouette, which is what Romeo might have become had he been much darker. I had to create internal contrast somehow. I chose to use a little bit of brown color rather than including solid whites.

Romeo had to be a blend of colors for visibility's sake, but most of my color choices were not based on realism. I wanted Romeo's book to have a sharp, crisp wintery feel, like something between a candy cane and a stick of wintermint gum. For that reason, I limited the palette to a range of glacial blues and crimsons. I keep returning to this habit of color restriction that arises from the practical limits of screen printing.

As I discussed in earlier posts, I drew most of these illustrations with my Wacom tablet, then printed to watercolor paper, then painted, scanned, and edited again. My sample illustration (pages 4-5) carries a softer feel, perhaps because I spent less time on the  drawing process for this piece than on any other. My drawing and painting stages for this page followed one another immediately, rather than occurring as separate processes. I think this actually resulted in a stronger piece, partly because when I draw first as a separate stage, I feel a responsibility to define everything with a kind of over-diligence, not trusting or leaving any shapes to the paint for fear that I would forget to include them. In future projects, I think I may let the drawing and painting compliment one another more naturally.

Another process division technique I devised proved more successful; I mixed and painted all my blues into all 30 pages as one step, then mixed and painted my crimsons. The negative space is white. Red, white and blue. Happy 4th of July.

1

2 - 3

4 - 5

6 - 7

8 - 9

10 - 11

12 - 13

14 - 15


16 - 17

18 -19

20 - 21

22 -23

24 - 25

26 - 27

28 - 29

30

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Artifact Studies and Random Notes

In junior high school I collaborated on a project with a small, mostly-female group of students. We were to design a unique, fictional culture and build illustrative cultural artifacts. We would bury said artifacts in a cardboard box filled with soil. Another team would then excavate our artifacts and guess about our culture. After several days of creative deliberation, we designed a pyramid-based matriarchy wherein men were kept underground as slaves, brought out occasionally to build more pyramids. Elvis was God. According to the artifact of my memory, middle school was a confused and hostile culture. I began this week's illustrations, again, with visual research. I still don't know everything about these artifacts, but my Stebbins Dance Festival book has some interesting statements about them. Part of what I do know I impart below. According to their cultural artifacts, the Yup'ik people practice artful dancing to drums while waving furred objects. They also spend time ...

Ad Hominem and the Carney Lexicon

Ad hominem is one of the better-known fallacies, perhaps because it is so common. In Latin, it means: "to the man." In American, it translates fuzzily to: "Oh yeah? Well, you're ugly." Broken down, the ad hominem argument looks like this: Person 1 makes claim X There is something objectionable about Person 1 (maybe ugliness) Therefore claim X is false Ad hominem is one of the many red-herring arguments, fallacious when it diverts attention from the core argument to focus on some flaw about the arguer. In creating my illustration, I needed a distracting character, and what character is more distracting than one of those bellowing circus-game people with the rings, bottles, and inflatable dolphin prizes? I quickly realized my vocabulary lacked a word for a purveyor of state-fair gamery, other than the generic "carney." Perhaps this is because I have never played a circus game, due to my lack of coordination and my dominant interest in spending my tick...

Work from Home

  The reference for this piece is a known work of fine art: a photograph by Peter Mitchell, a lorry driver who traversed West Yorkshire and occasionally snapped photos. The piece is titled Eric Massheder, Leeds, (1975) . Eric is the man in the doorway, a drippings refinery worker who posed in his home, adjacent (really, attached) to the refinery where he worked for 12 years. Eric woke up in his home in the morning, walked one room (or so) over, and began his shift. I have changed and omitted a few details for the sake of composition as usual. I've now been working from home for about four years, and I make a similar commute without stepping outdoors. My house even resembles Eric's a bit, though there's no factory nearby. I enter my workplace by transferring a USB cable, which joins all of my input and output devices from my personal computer to my work laptop. I stoop under my desk to make the transfer, so possibly a similar amount of exercise is involved—the digital equiva...