There'll be no more further personification of typefaces as NPR-style voices in this entry. You have my word.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1208/e1208505a5b6975d3283655d8e6612d93a929649" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/313ab/313ab3280218aab05ed6c446de3a29e04cc3b61f" alt=""
My intent here, in contrast, is not to hinder children using bunny boots. This book targets a fairly young age group, so I hope that the presence of the floating objects won't be too confusing. I appeal to any readers who have kids ages 4-8; do you think that floating gifts will throw young readers? Showing the objects in some capacity is necessary. For example, the illustration showing Lucy's dad building a dogsled should include a picture of a complete dogsled somewhere to put an image to the word. If I include the sled, part of the drawing must either leap forward in time (to show the finished product), or show intention, so a little bit of abstraction is unavoidable. I'm not really a fan of the thought bubble, which might be even more confusing to a four-year-old. For now, it seems best to let the object stand on its own.
I also show the outside of the house transforming to become the inside of a room; the shared line and colors add coherence to the design. I should point out, however, that the spine will bisect this illustration somewhat, dividing it to create two separate spaces, though the yarn causes some overlap. Hmm. I'll include a divided version to show this.
Thoughts and suggestions are welcome.
Comments
Post a Comment